Write a Blog >>
ICSE 2021
Mon 17 May - Sat 5 June 2021

Abstract—This paper describes the results of a large (+1100 responses) survey of professional software developers concerning standards for naming source code methods. The various standards for source code method names are derived from and supported in the software engineering literature. The goal of the survey is to determine if there is a general consensus among developers that the standards are accepted and used in practice. Additionally, the paper examines factors such as years of experience and programming language knowledge in the context of survey responses. The survey results show that participants very much agree about the importance of various standards and how they apply to names and that years of experience and the programming language has almost no effect on their responses. The results imply that the given standards are both valid and to a large degree complete. The work provides a foundation for automated method name assessment during development and code reviews.

Tue 25 May

Displayed time zone: Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna change

19:35 - 20:55
1.5.5. Developers: Naming Methods and VariablesTechnical Track / Journal-First Papers at Blended Sessions Room 5 +12h
Chair(s): José Miguel Rojas University of Leicester, UK
19:35
20m
Paper
How Developers Choose NamesJournal-First
Journal-First Papers
Dror Feitelson Hebrew University, Ayelet Mizrahi Hebrew University, Nofar Noy Hebrew University, Aviad Ben Shabat Hebrew University, Or Eliyahu Hebrew University, Roy Sheffer Hebrew University
Link to publication DOI Pre-print Media Attached
19:55
20m
Paper
IdBench: Evaluating Semantic Representations of Identifier Names in Source CodeTechnical Track
Technical Track
Yaza Wainakh TU Darmstadt, Moiz Rauf University of Stuttgart, Michael Pradel University of Stuttgart
Pre-print Media Attached
20:15
20m
Paper
A Context-based Automated Approach for Method Name Consistency Checking and SuggestionTechnical Track
Technical Track
Yi Li New Jersey Institute of Technology, Shaohua Wang New Jersey Institute of Technology, Tien N. Nguyen University of Texas at Dallas
Pre-print Media Attached
20:35
20m
Paper
On the Naming of Methods: A Survey of Professional DevelopersArtifact ReusableTechnical TrackArtifact Available
Technical Track
Reem S. Alsuhaibani Kent State University, Christian D. Newman Rochester Institute of Technology, Michael J. Decker Bowling Green State University, Michael L. Collard The University of Akron, Jonathan I. Maletic Kent State University
Pre-print Media Attached

Wed 26 May

Displayed time zone: Amsterdam, Berlin, Bern, Rome, Stockholm, Vienna change

07:35 - 08:55
1.5.5. Developers: Naming Methods and VariablesTechnical Track / Journal-First Papers at Blended Sessions Room 5
07:35
20m
Paper
How Developers Choose NamesJournal-First
Journal-First Papers
Dror Feitelson Hebrew University, Ayelet Mizrahi Hebrew University, Nofar Noy Hebrew University, Aviad Ben Shabat Hebrew University, Or Eliyahu Hebrew University, Roy Sheffer Hebrew University
Link to publication DOI Pre-print Media Attached
07:55
20m
Paper
IdBench: Evaluating Semantic Representations of Identifier Names in Source CodeTechnical Track
Technical Track
Yaza Wainakh TU Darmstadt, Moiz Rauf University of Stuttgart, Michael Pradel University of Stuttgart
Pre-print Media Attached
08:15
20m
Paper
A Context-based Automated Approach for Method Name Consistency Checking and SuggestionTechnical Track
Technical Track
Yi Li New Jersey Institute of Technology, Shaohua Wang New Jersey Institute of Technology, Tien N. Nguyen University of Texas at Dallas
Pre-print Media Attached
08:35
20m
Paper
On the Naming of Methods: A Survey of Professional DevelopersArtifact ReusableTechnical TrackArtifact Available
Technical Track
Reem S. Alsuhaibani Kent State University, Christian D. Newman Rochester Institute of Technology, Michael J. Decker Bowling Green State University, Michael L. Collard The University of Akron, Jonathan I. Maletic Kent State University
Pre-print Media Attached